Thoughts about Advair and alternatives
As I blogged about yesterday, many people have been asking about alternatives to Advair and Symbicort due to the high cost of these meds. I have listed some options here on this blog as they've come to me.
Today I have another option that has popped into my always thinking head. I'm a very curious person, and therefore sometimes I find myself thinking of things other people may never have considered. I'm not saying they'll work, I'm just thinking here.
It's something that's far out there, but actually it isn't. Since Advair** is an expensive mixure of a corticosteroid (Flovent) and long acting bronchodilator (Serevent) meant to treat both the chronic inflammation and prevent acute bronchospasm, why can't a mixture of less expensive meds be used as a replacement for Advair.
Of course Advair is the asthma wonder drug of choice not just because of what it prevents, but because it's easy to carry around, easy to use, and only needs to be taken twice a day. It's highly convenient, and makes asthmatics much more compliant than in years past. If cost were no obstacle, Advair is the medicine of choice.
The only problem with Advair (aside for some minor side effects), is that it costs an arm and a leg. And, since it costs so much, people who do not work, are poor, or have no health insurance have no way of gaining access to it. And it's these people we see in hospital emergency rooms.
So, as a replacement for an Advair discuss that costs $120 a month, why can't Asthmatics (and COPDers too), take Vanceril at $38 a month and Ventolin, which costs $42. That's still a chunk, but it's $40 less than Advair.
I can see a doctor switching a patient from Advair to Vanceril or some other generic corticosteroid (like Azmacort, Beclovent, Aerobid, etc). But instructing every asthmatic to take Ventolin every four hours is frowned upon. Why?
The asthma guidelines themselves say that any asthmatic who needs Ventolin more...
